Hello Patrick and Alexander, I am sorry for the late reply to your answers.
We are looking into this as well. From what I have seen so far I got the feeling LAVA is a bit "heavy" given the tasks that need to be performed. Please note that I am new to the LAVA system. Best Regards, Wim Vervoorn -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Rudolph [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, November 1, 2019 7:34 PM To: Alexander 'lynxis' Couzens <[email protected]> Cc: Wim Vervoorn <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [coreboot] Re: LAVA support Hi Wim, the lava as QA system is still being worked on, but currently has the lowest priority. While some hardware has been automated for firmware testing, some glue code is still missing. Some details can be found here: https://9esec.io/blog/bios-test-station/ Regards, Patrick On 2019-11-01 04:58 PM, Alexander 'lynxis' Couzens wrote: > Hi Wim, > > >> The coreboot site refers to the LAVA site as the QA system. It looks >> like some attempts have been made and then abandoned. > > that's so far true. I've setted up a lava environment some years ago, > but didn't had the time to continue and maintain it. > >> Does anyone know the current status? Did this not work out or is >> there another reason not to add additional platforms to the >> environment? > > It worked out to test coreboot. Patrick was also looking into it this > year. (CC: Patrick/siro). > > Maybe it's time to do another run of integrating it into the coreboot > CI? > > > Best, > lynxis > > _______________________________________________ > coreboot mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an > email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
