On 11/7/19 11:37 AM, Wim Vervoorn wrote: > Hello Patrick and Alexander,
Hi all, > > I am sorry for the late reply to your answers. > > We are looking into this as well. From what I have seen so far I got > the feeling LAVA is a bit "heavy" given the tasks that need to be > performed. Please note that I am new to the LAVA system. 3mdeb was on Automated Testing Summit 2019 (part of ELCE), where met Carl-Daniel (adding to cc). Also I'm adding 3mdeb Validation Team Leader. We had short discussion related. Presentations from ATS will available and it would be great if in coreboot we can align with that effort. In our opinion corebootCI and any automated validation system should be consistent with Linux kernel validation otherwise nobody would be able to handle maintenance of that system. More to that there is a we have in common with Linux validation, especially when we consider embedded environment. If we will invent new things we will contribute to validation ecosystem fragmentation. There were various approaches to solve that problem and community works on that. In 3mdeb we have pretty stable automated validation system integrated with CI that is based on 3mdeb RTE and Robot Framework, so we contributed to fragmentation, but would be glad to align and do that in correct inter-operable way: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_uRhVo9eYeZONnelymonYp444zYHT_Q_qmJEJ8_XqJc/edit?usp=sharing https://shop.3mdeb.com/product/rte/ If we can have organized community way of moving corebootCI and automated validation systems forward, then definitely we would like to help. Best Regards, -- Piotr Król Embedded Systems Consultant GPG: B2EE71E967AA9E4C https://3mdeb.com | @3mdeb_com _______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
