> I will create a repo for the qc stuff (let's discuss the details offline)

Okay, cool, thank you. Repo is created and I uploaded a patch to hook
it up to the build system here: https://review.coreboot.org/42548

> It may be good to get the various blob owners on board with such a license so 
> that we can have a single one that allows mere (re)distribution with little 
> effort on their and our part. Could you ask the QC folks if there's interest 
> in sorting this out?

I have mentioned this option to them already but they didn't really
pick it up. It seems to be *really* hard for them to make even the
slightest changes to any license text (I mean months to just change a
sentence or two), so I think the separate repository approach will be
the best we can do in the near term. On a scale of years we can keep
pointing out the friction caused by this and try to convince them to
move to a simpler license like Intel did (but remember how long that
took).

This still leaves the fbg1701 blob in the main blobs repository...
have you decided what to do with that?
_______________________________________________
coreboot mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to