I totally get that, just wanted to understand how the UEFI verification
process worked a little better.  When I was looking around at the boot
options I somehow confused a named USB for an actual partition that was
trying to boot, I'll put that into my mis-typed variable fail tranche.
Thanks!

On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 11:37 AM Matt DeVillier <matt.devill...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> This has nothing to do with coreboot, the message is from the UEFI
> payload (Tianocore/edk2). It's telling you that whatever boot device
> it is trying to boot (and it tells you in the error msg) does not
> contain a UEFI-bootable 64-bit OS. If you didn't install ChromeOS Flex
> to your internal storage, then that is why (since ChromeOS proper is
> not UEFI-bootable).
>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:10 AM CJ <christopher.galli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > First, I just want to thank all of you for what you do.  Using Coreboot
> is delightful.  I had a question about how the program verifies UEFI OS's.
> I'm using it to update a chromebook to ChromeOS flex and receiving the
> error; doesn't contain a verifiable 64-bit UEFI OS.d From the documentation
> ChromeOS Flex is supposed to be a 64 bit UEFI so I"m wondering if it could
> be something I did while creating the boot media, a problem with updating
> chromebook, or how coreboot is verifying the OS?  After entering the menu I
> can boot to the USB and install just fine so no big deal just curious why
> it gave that error.  Thanks again for putting in the work!  We all
> appreciate it.
> > _______________________________________________
> > coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
>
_______________________________________________
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org

Reply via email to