Peng Yu pointed out that the mailing list information on the project web page didn't mention this mailing list!
I just updated the mailing information there. http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/ I didn't mention coreutils-patches at all. But I also don't think a canonical process for dealing with patches has really settled out yet either. Should mention of sending patches to coreutils-patches be added? I am ambivalent. I wrote that requests for new features should go here to the coreutils list. I think that is best for an initial contact. After consideration the issue can be filed and tracked in the tracker at bug-coreutils. However feel free to disagree with that process. Before with only the one mailing list the protocol was simple and the web documentation didn't differentiate. But I think bringing up the discussion first makes the most sense. Bob
