Bob Proulx wrote: > Peng Yu pointed out that the mailing list information on the project > web page didn't mention this mailing list! > > I just updated the mailing information there. > > http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/
Thanks, Bob and Peng. > I didn't mention coreutils-patches at all. But I also don't think a > canonical process for dealing with patches has really settled out yet > either. Should mention of sending patches to coreutils-patches be > added? I am ambivalent. As-is looks fine. I suppose it could be confusing that I've sent FYI patches to [email protected]. I do that to avoid having a ticket opened for each. > I wrote that requests for new features should go here to the coreutils > list. I think that is best for an initial contact. After > consideration the issue can be filed and tracked in the tracker at > bug-coreutils. However feel free to disagree with that process. > Before with only the one mailing list the protocol was simple and the > web documentation didn't differentiate. But I think bringing up the > discussion first makes the most sense. No objection here.
