Pádraig Brady wrote:
> I'm going to start adding posix_fadvise() hints to various utils,
> but first I decided to clean up the interface a bit in a new module,
> and adjust the existing posix_fadvise() users to use it.
>
> The main reason for the separate module is one doesn't
> need ifdefs in each util, nor the ignore-value wrapper.
Thanks. Making it a module seems like a good idea.
Adding tests would be nice (though hardly urgent!), so that
eventually when/if it makes it into gnulib, using gnulib-tool
to run tests will exercise the interfaces.
> Subject: [PATCH] fadvise: new module providing a simpler interface to
> posix_fadvise
>
> +
> +void
> +fdadvise (int fd, off_t offset, off_t len, int advice)
> +{
> +#if HAVE_POSIX_FADVISE
> + ignore_value (posix_fadvise (fd, offset, len, advice));
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +void
> +fadvise (FILE *fp, int advice)
> +{
> + if (fp)
> + fdadvise (fileno (fp), 0, 0, advice);
Should these new functions fail with EINVAL when ADVICE is unrecognized?
