On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Jim Meyering <[email protected]> wrote: > +# This isn't terribly expensive, but it must not be run under heavy load. > +# Since the "very expensive" are already run only with -j1, adding this
"very expensive" tests > +# test to the list ensures it still gets _some_ (albeit minimal) coverage > +# while not causing false-positive failures in day to day runs. > +very_expensive_
