James Youngman wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Jim Meyering <[email protected]> wrote: >> +# This isn't terribly expensive, but it must not be run under heavy load. >> +# Since the "very expensive" are already run only with -j1, adding this > > "very expensive" tests > >> +# test to the list ensures it still gets _some_ (albeit minimal) coverage >> +# while not causing false-positive failures in day to day runs. >> +very_expensive_
Thanks. I've pushed this fix: >From c8392b368e33ed286dd00bf0c66bbae462513d61 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Youngman <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 09:15:06 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] maint: typo: insert omitted word in test comment * tests/misc/sort-spinlock-abuse: Fix typo: s/"very expensive" are/"very expensive" tests are/ --- tests/misc/sort-spinlock-abuse | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/misc/sort-spinlock-abuse b/tests/misc/sort-spinlock-abuse index 0e1c86b..0894ec9 100755 --- a/tests/misc/sort-spinlock-abuse +++ b/tests/misc/sort-spinlock-abuse @@ -21,9 +21,9 @@ print_ver_ sort # This isn't terribly expensive, but it must not be run under heavy load. -# Since the "very expensive" are already run only with -j1, adding this -# test to the list ensures it still gets _some_ (albeit minimal) coverage -# while not causing false-positive failures in day to day runs. +# Since the "very expensive" tests are already run only with -j1, adding +# this test to the list ensures it still gets _some_ (albeit minimal) +# coverage while not causing false-positive failures in day to day runs. very_expensive_ grep '^#define HAVE_PTHREAD_T 1' "$CONFIG_HEADER" > /dev/null || -- 1.7.6.rc2.4.g36bfb.dirty
