On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Jim Meyering <[email protected]> wrote: > Bernhard Voelker wrote: >> Here's a patch to move the code regarding physical/available/total >> memory down to where it's used (on top of your patch). > > Thanks. I've pushed that -- tweaked to move the rlimit declaration down, too:
The committed version does not include the limit to no more than 75% of physical memory. Was that intentional or an oversight? Cheers, Jeff
