Jeff Janes wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Jim Meyering <[email protected]> wrote: >> Bernhard Voelker wrote: >>> Here's a patch to move the code regarding physical/available/total >>> memory down to where it's used (on top of your patch). >> >> Thanks. I've pushed that -- tweaked to move the rlimit declaration down, >> too: > > The committed version does not include the limit to no more than 75% > of physical memory. Was that intentional or an oversight?
Bernhard's patch was quite deliberately (as the commit log says) intended to induce no semantic change.
