On 12/04/2013 05:17 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 12/04/2013 03:58 PM, Bernhard Voelker wrote: >> Well, I think it's confusing because of the names: >> 'openssl' and 'libcrypto' (shouldn't the latter be 'libgcrypt'?) are >> distinct packages on an actual system, so I don't see how a user may >> choose between them with 'yes'|'no'|'optional'. >> What do I miss? > > I shouldn't have mixed the names, but they're synonymous for me: > > $ rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libcrypto.so > openssl-devel...
I see - I should have expected cryptographic software to be cryptic ;-) Thanks. Have a nice day, Berny
