On 07/30/2014 11:20 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Is this useful enough that newer scripts are incompat with older systems without this functionality? I'm 50:50 TBH
Well, at least the behavior would be a bit closer to the docs: However, GNU `sleep' accepts arbitrary floating point numbers. Otherwise, we'd at least have to s/arbitrary/non-negative and positive-infinite/. Still, [-]NaN is never supported - neither direct nor as a result from "-inf inf". Have a nice day, Berny
