Pádraig Brady wrote: > Is this useful enough that newer scripts are incompat > with older systems without this functionality? > I'm 50:50 TBH
I know that Jim already opened the door by saying he would accept the feature if it were written. For my part I see this as creeping featurism and would vote against it. With the "camel in the tent" parable in mind I expect sleep to inevitably include full human date parsing routines at some point. If it will accept "1d -5s" then why not "all night" or "until the next blue moon"? Bob
