On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:56 PM Assaf Gordon <assafgor...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:35:01PM +0200, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > > On 8/2/19 9:05 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: > > > Nice work. I've had to go through this process a few times over the > > > years, and having these handy patch files checked in and maintained > > > would make it easier to automate the process. > > > While this work is definitely worth keeping, I'm only 20:80 to add > > something to the current (and future) version which belongs to older > > versions. > > > > What about either uploading it to the FTP, or even better to add it > > to the web pages' CVS? > > Adding it as a page to the website sounds good (it will also be easy > for people to find using common search engines). > I don't like the FTP idea so much - not very accesible unless you > know exactly what you're looking for. > > Attached is a possible HTML page (and the patches in a subdirectory).
Since it is something that may contribute to binaries I build (with the handy related build target), it feels like it belongs in version-control. Otherwise, if downloading from some web site, we'd have to verify the patches via gpg-signature or checksum before using them to build new binaries.