Pádraig Brady <p...@draigbrady.com> writes:

> On 25/09/2025 16:23, Michael Stone wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 01:05:52PM -0700, Collin Funk wrote:
>>> The gnu.org site is down or takes ages to load
>>> frequently nowadays.
>> Yes, I think a lot of normal people would give up before it finished
>> loading. I don't understand why the site is so slow, and it doesn't help
>> that the https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/ link gets redirected to
>> something like https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/html_node/
>> meaning you get to wait for the horribly slow load *twice* before
>> anything happens. Is there a reason not to change the links in the man
>> pages to point to where the html docs actually are?
> Yes gnu.org is bordering on unusable for months now,
> and it's a much larger issue than man page redirection.
>
> If users can't access gnu.org that's it.
> It's an existential issue.
>
> There is talk of malicious DoS and extra load from AI bots.
> But any site on the net has to deal with that.
> I mentioned cloudflare as an option on #fsfsys
> but was told there was a debate about that,
> with the decision it impacted user freedoms.
> Though of course inaccessibility to gnu.org is
> definitely directly impacting user freedoms.
>
> We could start installing HTML locally etc.
> but it still doesn't address the fundamental issue.
>
> If anyone has any insights or contacts even to discuss this with
> it would be appreciated.

Cloudflare would likely fix all our problems, but I didn't even bother
suggesting it because I know it would not happen.

They decided against using Anubis because of the use of Javascript. I
have mentioned using metarefresh challenges a few times since
sourceware.org uses them successfully (atleast seemingly so) and they do
not require javascript [2]. But those suggestions have been ignored.

I was going to suggest moving repositories to codeberg until I was told
about a decent way to use mirrors for pulling [3].

But outside of the git mirrors for pulling, I have mostly given up hope
that gnu.org will be fixed, sadly.

Collin

[1] https://www.fsf.org/blogs/sysadmin/our-small-team-vs-millions-of-bots
[2] https://anubis.techaro.lol/docs/admin/configuration/challenges/metarefresh/
[3] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2025-09/msg00205.html

Reply via email to