> Section 16.2 > > I think it's a little confusing to state the registry values require expert > review, > then buried in the 'label' description say it can be specification required. > Wouldn't it be more clear to state that a dependency exists and a > specification is > required in the intro paragraph for this section? This applies to the other > sections that also require a specification as it don't seem that all > registries do. >
I separated this issue because I think it is potentially going to need more discussion than any of the other issues. >From the IANA point of view, I want to keep these registry rules simple. That >is, I want IANA to treat the registries as if everything is expert review. Given that I want to break down the label ranges. Would it makes sense to move this language from here to section 16.11 so that it is clear that this will be for the expert reviewers to look at rather than for IANA to look at? Jim _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
