On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Jim Schaad <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes this is targeted at CoAP. CoAP should provide the needed fragmentation > and we are currently have discussions in the CORE group about the best way > to provide this both on a per message basis and a per fragment basis. Thank you, Jim. Spencer > Jim > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: COSE [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Spencer Dawkins > > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 12:03 PM > > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > draft- > > [email protected] > > Subject: [COSE] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-msg-18: > (with > > COMMENT) > > > > Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-cose-msg-18: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email > > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory > > paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria. > html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-msg/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > I'm going to be a No Objection for this doc no matter what, so it's safe > to > > answer my question :-) > > > > This is for use with CoAP, right? Would you rely on CoAP for > fragmentation, if > > that's required? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > COSE mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose > >
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
