No that is not correct. The correct input is called out in section 4.4. You can also look at https://github.com/jimsch/Examples/blob/master/ecdsa-examples/ecdsa-01.json for the ToBeSign_hex field
jim > -----Original Message----- > From: COSE [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lundblade, Laurence > Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 6:39 PM > To: cose <[email protected]> > Subject: [COSE] exact input to the sig computation > > Can you confirm for me the input to the signature computation (e.g. ECDSA) is > the concatenation of the the bstr wrapped protected headers and the bstr > wrapped payload? Pretty sure that's right, but it doesn't seem to be explicit in > the cose draft. Sorry if I missed it. > > Thx > > LL > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
