Well, I sure did miss it didn’t I. Thanks for the quick response. :-) LL
On Dec 5, 2016, at 7:26 PM, Jim Schaad <[email protected]> wrote: > No that is not correct. The correct input is called out in section 4.4. > > You can also look at > https://github.com/jimsch/Examples/blob/master/ecdsa-examples/ecdsa-01.json > for the ToBeSign_hex field > > jim > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: COSE [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lundblade, Laurence >> Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 6:39 PM >> To: cose <[email protected]> >> Subject: [COSE] exact input to the sig computation >> >> Can you confirm for me the input to the signature computation (e.g. ECDSA) > is >> the concatenation of the the bstr wrapped protected headers and the bstr >> wrapped payload? Pretty sure that's right, but it doesn't seem to be > explicit in >> the cose draft. Sorry if I missed it. >> >> Thx >> >> LL >> >> _______________________________________________ >> COSE mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
