Hi, Jim, On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:04 PM Jim Schaad <i...@augustcellars.com> wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: COSE <cose-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Alissa Cooper > > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 11:44 AM > > To: Matthew A. Miller <linuxwolf+i...@outer-planes.net> > > Cc: cose-cha...@ietf.org; Adam Roach <a...@nostrum.com>; IESG > > <i...@ietf.org>; cose@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [COSE] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on > charter-ietf-cose-01-00: > > (with COMMENT) > > > > > > > > > On Oct 10, 2018, at 2:35 PM, Matthew A. Miller <linuxwolf+ietf@outer- > > planes.net> wrote: > > > > > > On 18/10/10 12:18, Adam Roach wrote: > > >> On 10/10/18 12:57 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote: > > >>> s/full standard/proposed standard/ > > >> > > >> > > >> I think RFC 8152 is a Proposed Standard already. My reading is that > > >> the intention of this work item is to move it to Internet Standard. > > >> > > > > > > Yes, the intention is to move COSE to Internet Standard. > > > > Sorry, I made the wrong assumption without checking. I would still > suggest > > s/full standard/Internet standard/ > > This seems reasonable to me. I am probably still stuck in the terminology > for this from back in the 90s before the simplification. Oh, it's not THAT bad! This happened in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6410, dated 2011. Version -00 of the underlying individual draft is dated 2010. So you and I bravely enter the 2010 decade together. In IETF terms, that's recent enough for me to remember that the name changed, but I still have to check to verify which direction it changed ;-) Spencer
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list COSE@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
