Russ wrote: "I support re-charter, but the specific (to-be-determined) set of non-algorithm items need to be agreed. I also agree that certificate compression belongs on the list."
+1 I just learned that IETF 6TiSCH is relying on IEEE 802.11AR profiled X.509 certificates instead of RFC 7925 profiled X.509 certificates. It might be that the CBOR compression should support both. This could be done with small additions as the profiles are quite similar. I think the charter should leave the scope a bit more open on this point. John _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
