Hi all, I support the charter, with the addition/comment below made by John Mattsson about also keeping the RFC 7925 profile, as it is relevant for the IoT scenarios we are working on.
Best Regards Joel Höglund >> I just learned that IETF 6TiSCH is relying on IEEE 802.11AR profiled X.509 >> certificates instead of RFC 7925 profiled X.509 certificates. It might be that the >> CBOR compression should support both. This could be done with small >> additions as the profiles are quite similar. I think the charter should leave the >> scope a bit more open on this point.
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
