I wouldn’t say MUST, just highly recommended. If there is consensus for MUST I 
won’t object considering that the cost of protection is low for all the uses I 
can imagine.

LL

> On Mar 11, 2021, at 11:35 PM, John Mattsson 
> <john.mattsson=40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> New comment from Laurance on GitHub pointing out that proof-of-possesion
> is not enough. I think this point to that COSE integrity protection of the 
> end-entity certificate needs to be MUST.
> 
> Cheers,
> John
> 
> https://github.com/cose-wg/X509/pull/35
> 
>  This doesn't address the case where a CA correctly and intentionally
>  issued two certs for the same key with different characteristics (e.g.,
>  key use, expiration, other extensions) and the attacker swapped them.
> 
>  Maybe this: "When any field in a certificate beyond the key (e.g., key
>  use, expiration, other extensions) is used in security decisions by the
>  receiver, the COSE header containing or referencing the certificate
>  should be in the protected bucket"."
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Mattsson <john.matts...@ericsson.com>
> Date: Thursday, 11 March 2021 at 08:33
> To: Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org>
> Cc: cose <cose@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [COSE] Pull-request addressing issues #29 #30 #31 #33 in 
> draft-ietf-cose-x509-08
> 
> Yes it probably better to register a new media type. E.g.:
> 
> application/cose-x509-chain
> 
> Let's discuss tomorrow.
> 
> Cheers,
> John
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org>
> Date: Wednesday, 10 March 2021 at 21:03
> To: John Mattsson <john.matts...@ericsson.com>
> Cc: cose <cose@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [COSE] Pull-request addressing issues #29 #30 #31 #33 in 
> draft-ietf-cose-x509-08
> 
> On 24. Feb 2021, at 10:35, John Mattsson 
> <john.mattsson=40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>> - Added media type application/cbor for a COSE_X509 chain.
> 
> Why is that the right media type?
> (We have specific ones for everything else, no?)
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> COSE mailing list
> COSE@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose

_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list
COSE@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose

Reply via email to