John Mattsson <[email protected]> wrote: > New comment from Laurance on GitHub pointing out that > proof-of-possesion is not enough. I think this point to that COSE > integrity protection of the end-entity certificate needs to be MUST.
I think that the example is incorrect. If we have to protect End-Entity certificates, then we can just put in public keys and save hundreds of bytes. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
