On 2021-05-10, at 16:36, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: > > But 8152 predates that document, so it uses basic DN, which doesn’t have > <</>> yet, which is part of the problem you had.)
… and I should have added that this is fixed in draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct-15, which is really what you should be using anyway. BTW, it’s in the RFC editor queue, but I don’t understand its status: https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C416 Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
