On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 05:03:08PM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote: > On 2021-05-10, at 16:36, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > But 8152 predates that document, so it uses basic DN, which doesn’t have > > <</>> yet, which is part of the problem you had.) > > … and I should have added that this is fixed in > draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct-15, which is really what you should be > using anyway. > > BTW, it’s in the RFC editor queue, but I don’t understand its status: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C416
Interestingly, a few hours after your note, all three transitioned from "REF*R" to "RFC-EDITOR*R", which is only slightly less confusing... (I would have assumed that their systems have loop detection if the REF state was just from mutual dependencies...) -Ben _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
