John Mattsson <[email protected]> wrote: > What I think C509 certificates needs is a CSR format allowing all types > of C509 certificates to be requested. I don't think CWT will or should > support that much of RFC 5280.
I'm arguing against a third signature format. I'm happy with having the key/value pairs all come from 5280. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
