On 2021-05-28, at 16:30, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I'm arguing against a third signature format. > >> So would you be happy with a PoC that transforms C509 CSR into PKCS10? > > i.e. we are compressing CSR, not alliterating it.
Yes, but there would be no reason to compress RFC 2986 (“CSR”) into a structure that is different from the structure we use for compressing RFC 5820 (“X.509”). Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
