On 2021-12-08, at 13:30, Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]> wrote: > > EAT by itself is not really an interoperable spec. COSE on its own is not > interoperable either.
If I guess about the definition of "interoperable spec” you are using here, ASCII is not an interoperable spec either - you still have to agree on what the text means… Still, ASCII was kind of useful as the basis for a lot of interoperability, I think. I think the point here was to shape some CDDL that makes it easier to talk about the way a more specific (interoperable?) spec uses COSE (which does have CDDL, just not in a way that usually can be integrated as-is to express the additional constraints a COSE-using specification typically makes). Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
