I’m in favor for WG adoption. As a teaser for possible WG work on this, the document could give more specific guidance about what the inclusion in a header actually *means*. Also, it would be useful to align this draft with UCCS [1].
Grüße, Carsten [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rats-uccs/ On 2022-06-14, at 19:24, Ivaylo Petrov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear all, > > This message starts the call for adoption of the following draft as working > group item: > > * draft-looker-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers-00 > - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-looker-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers/ > > In light of the discussion during the last IETF and the request by my > co-chair, there seems to be some interest in the working group to work on > that document. If you have read the draft, please indicate whether you > support its adoption as a working group item or not. > > We would also like to remind you that adoption does not mean a document is > finished, only that it is an acceptable starting point. > > This call will run for two weeks, ending on June 28. Please try to respond > before that date. > > Best regards, > > - Ivaylo on behalf of the COSE Working Group Chairs > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
