I am also in favor of WG adoption. -DW
> On Jun 16, 2022, at 5:12 AM, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: > > I’m in favor for WG adoption. > > As a teaser for possible WG work on this, the document could give more > specific guidance about what the inclusion in a header actually *means*. > Also, it would be useful to align this draft with UCCS [1]. > > Grüße, Carsten > > [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rats-uccs/ > > On 2022-06-14, at 19:24, Ivaylo Petrov <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> This message starts the call for adoption of the following draft as working >> group item: >> >> * draft-looker-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers-00 >> - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-looker-cose-cwt-claims-in-headers/ >> >> In light of the discussion during the last IETF and the request by my >> co-chair, there seems to be some interest in the working group to work on >> that document. If you have read the draft, please indicate whether you >> support its adoption as a working group item or not. >> >> We would also like to remind you that adoption does not mean a document is >> finished, only that it is an acceptable starting point. >> >> This call will run for two weeks, ending on June 28. Please try to respond >> before that date. >> >> Best regards, >> >> - Ivaylo on behalf of the COSE Working Group Chairs >> _______________________________________________ >> COSE mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
