Sorry -- Ilari! -----Original Message----- From: Hannes Tschofenig Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 7:28 PM To: Ilari Liusvaara <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: RE: [COSE] HPKE Proposals: Something for the group to decide
Laurence, I would prefer not to design the HPKE auth mode without a scenario to motivate it. Ciao Hannes -----Original Message----- From: COSE <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Ilari Liusvaara Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 7:22 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [COSE] HPKE Proposals: Something for the group to decide On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 09:54:51AM -0800, Laurence Lundblade wrote: <about HPKE auth mode> > This could be in a separate draft, but we should at least anticipate > how mode_auth is distinguished from mode_base. I would say use another alg, since you wind up with nontrivial spec work anyway. And just substituting the mode leads to flawed results. AFAICT, Neither PR9 and PR10 preclude reusing the HSI codepoint for this sort of extension in another draft. -Ilari _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
