> I think we could register HPKE-BASE and say it is v1 in the text of the IANA registration.
Yes, This is what I meant by "implicitly". > RFC 9180 does not discuss versions. Yes. I think it's a problem with the HPKE standard that the string "HPKE-v1" is used in the key derivation process, but the version is not mentioned. -- Daisuke 2022年12月1日(木) 3:02 Laurence Lundblade <[email protected]>: > > > > On Nov 30, 2022, at 9:26 AM, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 2022-11-30, at 18:17, Laurence Lundblade <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> the HPKE version > > > > Where is that concept defined? > > Daisuke mentioned it a few messages back. Agree that it is not very well > defined in 9180. > > > > > RFC 9180 does not discuss versions. > > (It does cargo-cult a “-v1” into some strings. Duuh.) > > Enjoyed the parenthetical. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult > > LL
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
