On 2023-01-19, at 12:47, AJITOMI Daisuke <[email protected]> wrote: > > But it seems to me that they are all based on the old specification > (RFC8152). I am looking for an implementation that conforms to the new one > (RFC9052).
Just in case people reading this misunderstand the role of RFC 9052: RFC 9052 (and the other RFCs in STD96) do not create a new format, they just present the format defined in RFC 8152 in an improved way. Of course, the one exception is RFC 9338 (countersignatures); this is indeed a new take on countersignatures (countersignatures V2) relative to RFC 8152. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
