Sorry. I made a mistake; I meant to say RFC 9338. -- Daisuke
2023年1月19日(木) 21:02 Carsten Bormann <[email protected]>: > On 2023-01-19, at 12:47, AJITOMI Daisuke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > But it seems to me that they are all based on the old specification > (RFC8152). I am looking for an implementation that conforms to the new one > (RFC9052). > > Just in case people reading this misunderstand the role of RFC 9052: > > RFC 9052 (and the other RFCs in STD96) do not create a new format, they > just present the format defined in RFC 8152 in an improved way. > > Of course, the one exception is RFC 9338 (countersignatures); this is > indeed a new take on countersignatures (countersignatures V2) relative to > RFC 8152. > > Grüße, Carsten > >
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
