Thanks for the super quick response, Carsten. Shortening the text by referencing Section 4.2.1 of RFC 8949 sounds like a good idea. Will do this with the next draft version.
Ciao Hannes > -----Original Message----- > From: COSE <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Carsten Bormann > Sent: Samstag, 27. Mai 2023 10:32 > To: Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Isobe Kohei <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [COSE] draft-isobe-cose-key-thumbprint > > I agree with the approach behind this draft. > > I wouldn’t mind making it explicit that the hashing input is simply derived by > deterministic encoding as per Section 4.2.1 of RFC 8949 — it is not just the > map > ordering, but also the use of preferred encoding; and there is nothing special > about the encoding used by this draft. This is all described in RFC 8949 and > doesn’t need a detailed restatement (although calling out the map ordering > specifically is fine, and it is good to have the example doing that ordering). > > Grüße, Carsten > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
