Thank you for the feedback! I have opened this PR to address some of the comments received:
https://github.com/ietf-scitt/draft-steele-cose-merkle-tree-proofs/pull/17 I understand now the current CDDL examples are an anti-pattern. I could use some assistance on correcting those examples. Regards, OS On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 4:14 PM Christopher Allen < [email protected]> wrote: > BTW, if your implementation supports COSE Externally Signed Data ( > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8152.html#section-4.3) and your use > case includes requirements for data minimization or selective disclosure of > structured data (single node, lists, trees, or many graph data variations) > you may want to separate signing from those functions by using CBOR-based > Gordian Envelopes: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mcnally-envelope/ > > We have a reference implemention in Rust, but we don’t have a demo of > using COSE detached external signatures, but it should work. > > — Christopher Allen > -- ORIE STEELE Chief Technology Officer www.transmute.industries <https://transmute.industries>
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
