Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-cose-key-thumbprint-05: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-key-thumbprint/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 2: If COSE keys are specifically public asymmetric keys and/or symmetric keys, you could mention that here. It becomes partially apparent throughout the reading of the draft, but it would be nice if it was up front. Section 5.3: The second sentence is trivially true. The question is whether a different kind of key can use the thumbprint algorithm. Perhaps the second should say, 'Any party in possession of a key that is represented as a COSE Keys can use...' Section 5.6, para 4?, last sentence: For error handling: It seems like there should be a MUST or at least a SHOULD instead of the current 'will need to'. _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
