That proposed text works for me. OS
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 11:42 AM Michael Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > In 5.3, I suggest changing the text from "Keys that are in other formats > can be represented as COSE Keys. Any party in possession of COSE Keys can > use the COSE Key Thumbprint." to "Keys that are in other formats can be > represented as COSE Keys. Any party in possession of those keys can create > their corresponding COSE Key representations and use the COSE Key > Thumbprint." > > -- Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: Deb Cooley via Datatracker <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2024 3:15 AM > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-cose-key-thumbprint-05: > (with COMMENT) > > Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-cose-key-thumbprint-05: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-key-thumbprint/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Section 2: If COSE keys are specifically public asymmetric keys and/or > symmetric keys, you could mention that here. It becomes partially apparent > throughout the reading of the draft, but it would be nice if it was up > front. > > Section 5.3: The second sentence is trivially true. The question is > whether a > different kind of key can use the thumbprint algorithm. Perhaps the second > should say, 'Any party in possession of a key that is represented as a COSE > Keys can use...' > > Section 5.6, para 4?, last sentence: For error handling: It seems like > there > should be a MUST or at least a SHOULD instead of the current 'will need to' -- ORIE STEELE Chief Technology Officer www.transmute.industries <https://transmute.industries>
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
