hi Francesca, On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 at 10:41, Francesca Palombini <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Thomas. I have reviewed the registration request and I don’t see any > issues, approved pending IESG approval. I was considering the codepoint, and > given how I expect these parameters to contain quite large values, I am > conflicted between labels 36 and 37 (2 bytes) or 258 and 259 (3 bytes).
You are absolutely right, these values can easily weigh 5K or more. 258 and 259 look great (especially 259, a lucky number [1].) cheers, thanks! t [1] https://oeis.org/A000959 _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
