Hi Carsten, On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 at 16:55, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2025-01-13, at 21:27, Thomas Fossati <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > As noted in Shuping's ARTART review [1], table 1 contains a typo: > > "3161-tcc" should read "3161-ttc" instead. > > Would it make sense to expand the abbreviation in the description?
I've been staring at the table for about 10 minutes, trying two or three different reformulations. However, I found them all to be inferior to the current version - each one felt slightly awkward and somewhat redundant. Can you suggest a couple of good one-liners? Sorry! :-( t _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
