The changes were made. Thanks for the review.
Paul On Tue, Oct 7, 2025 at 9:50 AM Ketan Talaulikar via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote: > Ketan Talaulikar has entered the following ballot position for > charter-ietf-cose-04-00: Block > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-cose/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > BLOCK: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This is not related to the new charter text but the old one. There are two > blobs: > > 1) > Potential candidates would include those algorithms that have been > evaluated by > the CFRG and algorithms which have gone through a public review and > evaluation > process such as was done for the NIST SHA-3 algorithms. > > 2) > The COSE WG will not innovate in terms of > cryptography. The specification of algorithms in COSE is limited to > those in RFCs, active CFRG or IETF WG documents, or algorithms which > have been positively reviewed by the CFRG. > > I think (2) is good and already covers what (1) intends? If so, please > consider > removing the redudnant blob at (1). > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I also support the blocking point raised by Med. > > > >
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
