On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Assuming just one CouchDB server, would having the data store be NFS based > even work? > What about multiple servers? I can definitely see chaos emerging from > multiple servers building View indexes simultaneously, but what if > read-access was done with 'update=false'?
I'd say, you'd probably have a slow experience. Also note that there is no guarantee that update=false will be read-only. We're considering calling it something like stale=ok, to better capture the guarantees it (doesn't) make. -- Chris Anderson http://jchris.mfdz.com
