Probably a bad idea, a lot of NFS implementation would not respect flush() in the same way that a disk would.caching at the local level is also going to cause a whole lot of problem.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Assuming just one CouchDB server, would having the data store be NFS based > even work? > What about multiple servers? I can definitely see chaos emerging from > multiple servers building View indexes simultaneously, but what if > read-access was done with 'update=false'? > What about writes with multiple servers? > > Just wondering if there are any *immediate* gotchas that I should be aware > of (e.g., NFS - Just Say No :-) ) > > cheers > --- > Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya > CTO, Aptela Inc. > (703.386.1500 x9100) > http://www.aptela.com > >
