[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > AD 54-26-02 addresses the wear of cables at the control quadrant. It > states that any one of four FAA approved modifications listed would > satisfy the AD. On this forum it was stated that the only approved > modification was the installation of the new quadrant with a part number > of 415-52137 which is the last method (of the four) listed in the AD. > I have removed my column and the quadrant was manufactured by > "Met-Co-Aire" which is the manufacturer listed in the AD for the first > approved method. > My question is: Is there any other directives that I do not have that > eliminates all of the other three methods except the last? Or is the > fourth method the only one currently available so therefore becomes by > default the only approved method? . > > Rich Blair > N99997 4J6 > St. Marys, Ga. > >Hi Rich, in the process of rehab on my hanger mate's 415c coupe s/n 834 we are overhauling his control quadrant,controls,etc.-I found the cable quadrant to be the Met-co-Aire p/n 415-1.The quad. has smooth curveture on the edges.the erco p/n52130 has the abrupt edge, however the cable groove is twice as deep as the met-co-aire 415-1.I also have modified a 52130 quad by grinding much more rounder corners.As of yet I haven't seen a 52137 quad or a met-co-aire print, so I am not moving any further on signing of on AD 54-26-02 until I do so. Ted Sac,Ca.2654H --------------------------------- > to unsubscribe send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ___________________________________________________________ > T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16 > Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
--------------------------------- to unsubscribe send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___________________________________________________________ T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16 Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
