----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any
advice in this forum.]----

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -- Topica Digest --
> 
> ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm
> before following any advice in this forum.]----
> 
> 
> 
>       
>       Re: static source
>       By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       
>       FAA websites, AD listing, accident  reports
>       By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       
>       Re: static source
>       By [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 07:51:22 -0800
> From: "pmanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [COUPERS-TECH]  static source
> 
> 
> The stock Pitot tube assembly has two tubes leading
> from it. One
> is a pitot pressure port, the other is the static
> source.
> 
> I don't know if this same assembly is used on the
> later Alons
> and Mooneys, but the earlier Coupes are set up this
> way.
> 
> Cheers:
> 
> Paul
> N2273H
> 
> 
> > Hi group,
> > Does anyone have any information on adding an
> actual static port to the
> > coupe.  Mine is apparently vented to the cabin for
> a static source and
> > my airspeed 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:40:50 EST
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: FAA websites, AD listing, accident  reports
> 
> 
>  <A
>
HREF="http://av-info.faa.gov/ad/AD.htm";>Airworthiness
> Directives</A>  <A 
> HREF="http://afs600.faa.gov/";>AFS600</A> 
> 
> Harry Francis 
> Blacksburg, VA.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:19:45 -0500
> From: Greg Bullough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [COUPERS-TECH]  static source
> 
> 
> At 11:14 PM 3/27/01 -0800, Glen wrote:
> >----[Please read
> http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following
> any 
> >advice in this forum.]----
> >
> >Are you sure there is no static?  Take up the last
> couple screws on your
> >left wing fairing and look in the crack between the
> wing and the center wing
> >section and see if there are two lines run or just
> one.  Usually they are
> >run right along the rear spar.  Probably the static
> just isn't hooked up.
> 
> Yes, but won't it be great fun if either the static
> isn't hooked up or worse
> yet, the tube inside the wing has gone leaky?
> 
> Has anyone added a fuselage-mounted static port? I'm
> guessing it might
> be tough, given the way the cowling sticks out and
> the wing fillets affect
> things.
> 
> But it sure would be easier to service.
> 
> By the way, if the aluminum tubing in the wing IS
> leaking on your
> static or pitot line, what's to do, other than rip
> the covering off?
> 
> Greg
> 
>Sometimes you can snake a new tube into the wing &
secure it to the existing line (tie wraps or
whatever), Just leave the old line in there.  I have
seen this done and have owned an aircraft (Stinson)
which had the additional tube snaked through the wing,
it was in there when I acquired the plane.  I
personally never had any problems with the FAA on
this...but that WAS in the old days.
Take care,
John Newman
 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> to unsubscribe send
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> End of [EMAIL PROTECTED] digest, issue 270
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=text

---------------------------------
to unsubscribe send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

==^================================================================
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Sid.bAhN69
Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A  -- Learn More. Surf Less.
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose.
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01
==^================================================================

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to