FWIW, I have heard it said that the C90 is a better conversion than the O-200 because the latter was not matched well to the STC specified prop. I do not know if it is actually true though. You may want to ask for opinions.
David Abrams [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ercoupe.com ---------- From: Donald Kavalench[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 1998 12:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: The continuing saga of C-FJGW, an 0-200 STC, and a cracked main gear. For those of you just joining us - last time our beloved restoration project delivered the face dropping surprise that the quaint yet surprisingly expensive little A-75 Continental which was purchased for our baby can sadly never be used in an Ercoupe. "Nice conversation piece," said Linda, Spike's lovely and up til now remarkably understanding wife, without much enthusiasm. Clearly, something had to be done. Well it was decided after much gnashing of teeth, shifting of eyes and repeated application of (Spikes) head to the wall that an 0-200 would be the logical remedy to the situation. Henceforth a plea goes out over the ether for a copy of an STC for the 0-200 conversion. Anyone? Anyone?
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
