I agree. I see no problem with the new format, other than an occasional censure when I forget to reply to the list that accepts my bunk. Why make a big deal out of where the posts come from? Either way you get them.
Larry "Bob U." wrote: > This really is much ado about nothing once EMOTION is stripped away. > > For some reason, when Tom REVAMPED THE LIST, it seemed order was going > to come from chaos. Well, it still has a way to go, eh? <g> > > Those that are not convinced yet, should give things a fair chance and > attempt to enjoy the new structure as much as they would enjoy the > orderlies of a dictionary or encyclopedia. Who would favor jumbling > up the words and topics in them? > > There really is no threat to anyone that thinks positively about this > new orderly setup within Tom's ORIGINAL bunch of folks... or newcomers. > There is room for all, just like always, just like before. > I want to say..... ONLY BETTER. > But, some folks are not ready to hear this kind of message, yet. > Better to shoot the messenger. <g> > > -Bob Urban- > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Dick Chevalier wrote: > > > > --------------------------- > > "Why move to another group, with the trouble makers, it will soon be as > > messed up as this one WAS before they left? > > As I said, I'm not leaving and neither should any of you." > > Bob Saville > > ---------------------------- > > "Now it appears to me that these folks are the FIRST TO CRY FOUL about > > diluting the ORIGINAL list. So much for the debasing of the ORIGINAL. > > > > Other successful LISTS that have been around for years, do not > > cater to chatty aspects of the owners. In fact it is usually taboo. > > > > Apparently, things are not going to work this way, if some folks can > > prevent it." > > Bob Urban > > > > ------------------------------- > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Bob S.: Nobody in favor of the tech list is trying to cause anyone > > interested in staying with the non-tech list from doing so. The people who > > were causing the trouble on the original list aren't the ones who left. > > >From what I can see most are still here. > > > > Bob U.: You have hit the the nail on the head. For reasons I fail to > > understand, many voices who favored jokes and other non-tech discussion seem > > to be spending most of their keystrokes griping about and mis-representing > > the tech list as the place where the trouble makers are and encourage others > > not to participate. Yet the tech list takes nothing away from them. It is > > however, a glaring reminder that a significant number of people disapproved > > of the behavior of a few. That peer pressure is why this list is calmer > > now. > > > > Dick > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ ______ > > To unsubscribe from this list please send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _____________________________________________________________ > > Check out the new and improved Topica site! > > http://www.topica.com/t/13 > > __________________________________________________________________________ ______ > To unsubscribe from this list please send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _____________________________________________________________ > Check out the new and improved Topica site! > http://www.topica.com/t/13 __________________________________________________________________________ ______ To unsubscribe from this list please send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _____________________________________________________________ Check out the new and improved Topica site! http://www.topica.com/t/13
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
