On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 10:24:53AM +0100, Peter Mann wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 08:56:51AM +0000, Brian Candler wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:58:03PM +0100, Alan Marco IsiMan wrote: > > > We're going to install a new email platform and we have a big doubt. > > > What is better for our /var/mail, OCFSv2 or NFS? I mean, SAN or NAS. > > > There'll be three machines reading /var/mail and writing in it (webmail > > > write in sent folder and courier-imap in all folders). Courier-Imap is > > > good for NFS? Has someone installed OCFSv2 for /var/mail? > > > > If you don't want to use NFS or a global filesystem, then your other option > > is to build a proxy-based cluster. This means you build a series of small > > independent mail servers, each with local disk and holding a subset of your > > users accounts. The incoming POP3/IMAP connections are each redirected to > > the right cluster member. Unfortunately, sqwebmail does not currently > > implement such proxying. > > i'm using more backend mail servers with Postfix + Courier-IMAP/POP3 and > Perdition POP/IMAP Proxy + LDAP (with mailHost attributes for backend > mail servers) ... so any mail client can connect only to Perdition > POP/IMAP proxy ...
Yes, there are many possible POP3/IMAP proxies to choose from, including courier-imap itself which has built in proxying capability. However, what I said was that *sqwebmail* does not have the ability to proxy to different sqwebmail servers, and that remains true. Brian. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Courier-imap mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-imap
